On the one hand, although small class classes are very popular, the threshold for small class classes is not low. For example, small classes have extremely high requirements on teachers. In addition to teaching well in the classroom, teachers must also have the ability to interact with multiple students online, and ensure that the time allocated to each student is even. After all, no parent wants their child to receive less attention than others.
This also invisibly increases the cost of excellent teacher recruitment and training management for institutions. In the current situation where country email list good teachers are scarce in the entire education industry, it is even more difficult to solve.
On the other hand, there are many inherent weaknesses in the student partner model it advocates. Different from the 1-to-1 mode, a single student can choose courses for any period of time on the platform, while small-class classes need to take into account the academic level, class time, learning progress, etc. of different students, which invisibly increases the grouping of small-class teachers. difficulty. In addition, it is difficult to fix students in small-class institutions. The premise of student partners driving the learning atmosphere is that they are familiar with each other and have a fixed relationship, but it is difficult for small-class institutions to guarantee this. Based on the above reasons, the small class mode is still in the state of "looking good".
The 1-to-1 mode applauds but not the seats
Compared with large classes and small classes, the advantages of the 1-to-1 model are obvious.
First of all, the interaction between students and teachers is better in the one-to-one mode. Different from the "1-to-many" mode of large and small classes, in the 1-to-1 mode, students and teachers can communicate at any time and place at any time, which can maximize the interaction effect and improve the teaching experience.
Second, the 1-to-1 model is also more flexible than the big and small classes. Due to the large number of students in large classes and small classes, many aspects need to be considered in class scheduling and group grouping, but one-to-one does not need to consider this issue. The effect can also be better guaranteed.
Finally, 1-to-1 is also more targeted. For example, in the 1-to-1 mode, teachers can give targeted guidance according to different situations such as students' learning situation, learning ability, and learning habits, so as to help students form targeted solutions.
However, most of the current mainstream one-to-one companies are still losing money. For example, Xueda Education, which started 1-to-1 teaching earlier, and the head of 1-to-1, which currently has a high valuation, are still at a loss, and it is even rarer for some small and medium-sized 1-to-1 tutoring institutions to be profitable.
The reason why 1-to-1 institutions have less profit is related to many factors. On the one hand, due to the low entry threshold of the 1-on-1 model, a large number of players poured into the industry under the tuyere of the industry, resulting in intensified competition in the industry. For example, compared with class institutions that need to have relevant qualifications, the early one-to-one institutions did not have many clear restrictions, which paved the way for the next fierce competition in the industry.
On the other hand, the business model of many 1-to-1 institutions has not worked, which leads to the larger the scale of many tutoring institutions, the more serious the diseconomies of scale. Due to the lack of effective verification of the business model, it is difficult for many one-to-one institutions to maintain rapid expansion, and the fierce market competition has pushed up the cost of customer acquisition, so losses are inevitable. Because of this, most 1-to-1 institutions are basically in a state of "applause but not crowd".
Different models have different advantages and disadvantages. For institutions, no matter which model is adopted, the ultimate goal is to achieve a balance between their commercial interests an